For more see: Unethical? and Rangel Center and
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Congressman Rangel's Monument to Charles Rangel
For more see: Unethical? and Rangel Center and
Is the Pentagon Hiding Halliburton War Profiteering?
When it appeared that Kellog-Brown-Root, once part of Halliburton (and still may be), could not adequately explain over a billion dollars in billings, Mr. Charles Smith, a Pentagon contract manager, confronted the company. Without receiving an adequate answer to his queries, he then threatened to levy penalties of 15 percent on future work payments and to block future performance bonuses.
But Smith must have upset the Pentagon because he was suddenly fired. And instead of assigning a different contract manager to the case, the Pentagon hired an outside contractot to review the situation. Well, you can imagine the rest of the story. Not only was KBR exonerated and received all of its billings, but got bonuses on top of that. And guess what? KBR has been awarded a new 10-year $150 billion contract.
In the video below, it was anticipated that if the Democrats won the 2004 election, Henry Waxman's committee would deal sternly with war profiteers. But when the Democrats won, apparently nothing changed.
For more see: Dina Rasor and NYTimes
Video Length 9 min 55 sec
Video Length 6 min 23 sec
But Smith must have upset the Pentagon because he was suddenly fired. And instead of assigning a different contract manager to the case, the Pentagon hired an outside contractot to review the situation. Well, you can imagine the rest of the story. Not only was KBR exonerated and received all of its billings, but got bonuses on top of that. And guess what? KBR has been awarded a new 10-year $150 billion contract.
In the video below, it was anticipated that if the Democrats won the 2004 election, Henry Waxman's committee would deal sternly with war profiteers. But when the Democrats won, apparently nothing changed.
For more see: Dina Rasor and NYTimes
Tuesday, July 8, 2008
Yankee Go Home?
Although Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki ignored the Iraq Parliament earlier under severe pressure from the Bush administration to sign the agreement, he now is insisting on a timetable for withdrawal. Still, the Bush admionistration seems determined to force it upon Malili. If the Iraqis want a timetable for withdrawal, why does the Bush administration refuse? Are we no longer liberators? Have we become occupiers, as the Iraqis call us now? Is oil at the heart of the dispute?
For mre see: Iraqi Letter and NYTimes and Press Association
Thursday, June 19, 2008
Is the Iraq War About Oil After All?
In spite of rhetoric about trying to foster a sovereign Iraq, it seems that the Bush administration wants to maintain control over Iraq indefinitely. Seemingly, against the will of the Iraqi people, the Bush administration is said to be forcing a long-term occupation agreement on Iraq, threatening to withhold billions of dollars unless such an agreement is reached by July 31. The agreement would clearly undermine Iraqi sovereignty. The U.S.: wants its troops and contractors to be immune from Iraqi law, free to commit crimes with inpugnity; wants to control Iraqi airspace; wants to have dozens of permanent U.S. bases in Iraq indefinitely; refuses to specify a withdrawal plan; and wants the freedom to deploy military operations at any time without the permission of the Iraqi government. This is the furthest thing from Iraqi sovereignty.
Two officials of the Iraqi government appeared before Congress recently indicating their opposition to this agreement and begging for help from Congress to keep the Bush administration from forcing this upon them. They say that Iraqis want a timetable for total withdrawal and that, perhaps 70% to 90% of Iraqis want U.S. occupation to end.
Why, then, in spite of an Iraqi plea to set a timetable for withdrawal, does the Bush administration ignore those pleas. One theory comes from Brian Hicks. He claims that the Bush administration needs the permanent presence of our military to insure that American oil companies have access to the oil at a cost of billions per year. See his article at: Energy & Capital.
For more: NYTimes and LATimes and Middle East correspondent Patrick Cockburn discuss the situation.
Part 1--Iraqi Oil Law
Part 2--Iraqi Oil Law
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Is the U.S. Funding the Taliban?
The U.S. has given Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf billions of dollars to fight Al-Quida and the Tailban. But Pakistani journalist Ahmed Rashid explains that: much of that money has gone to arm and finance the Taliban; how the CIA pays Pakistan to arrest al-Qaeda operatives, but Pakistan uses the money to fund the Taliban resurgence in northwest Pakistan; and how the U.S. and NATO’s failure to deal with Afghan civil society has led directly to the huge rise of the opium trade that funds the Taliban.
For more see: Killing Ourselves and Return of the Taliban
Thursday, May 22, 2008
Pentagon Pundits Scandal
For years now, retired military officers have been used by network TV programs to assess the most current situation and to give guidance and advice on the future concerning the Iraq war. What the networks did not know, but should have discovered, was that The Pentagon was orchestrating the viewpoints of these men even to the point of writing scripts for them to mouth on TV. Their glowing reports were made to ramp up support for the War, according to the New York Times, which broke the story. Worse, some of these same former officers had financial holdings in some of the contractors and companies upon which they were opining, without disclosing such ties.
For More see: Democracy Now and The Nation
Video Length 3 min 54 sec
Video Length 9 min 27 sec
For More see: Democracy Now and The Nation
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Corn Ethanol Doesn't Seem an Answer
For more see: Mother Jones and Financial Sense and Brazilian Ethanol
Thursday, May 15, 2008
His Hair's On Fire
Yet, unless the entitlement programs of medicare, medicaid and social security are changed, they, along with interest on the debt, will grow to outstrip all available resources and crowd out all discretionary spending. The crisis is not yet obvious to citizens and it is easier for Congress not to act, but the longer this goes unaddressed, the more difficult it will be to fix---and if they wait too long, it will not be fixable. Walker likens our situation to a car headed for a crash into the Grand Canyon at 100 miles per hour. If you watch Walker explain the seriousness of our situation in this short video, it will likely scare the dickens out of you.
For more see: NYTimes and GAO Report
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
White House Ignores Corruption
The Bush administration has ignored corruption at the highest levels 
within the Iraqi government and tried to keep it a secret according to two former State Department officials. According to them, this was to retain a good relationship with the Iraqi government. It seems that allowing fraud and corruption by Iraqis is simply part of paying the Iraqi government for continuing to supporting the United States mission. Instead of just providing the Iraqi government with U.S. aid, the White House strategy is to also pay off Iraqi officials for being allies. In fact, much of the "success" of the surge has been related to "buying" the loyalty of insurgents. But when we stop paying them, what will happen? Will they continue to be allied with the U.S.?
White House supporters in Congress snuck a provision into a previous defense funding bill that eliminated the federal agency that investigates fraud in Iraq. And Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has announced that neither he nor his cabinet may be investigated for corruption.
For more see: SFChronicle and NBC
Video Length 11 min 8 sec
within the Iraqi government and tried to keep it a secret according to two former State Department officials. According to them, this was to retain a good relationship with the Iraqi government. It seems that allowing fraud and corruption by Iraqis is simply part of paying the Iraqi government for continuing to supporting the United States mission. Instead of just providing the Iraqi government with U.S. aid, the White House strategy is to also pay off Iraqi officials for being allies. In fact, much of the "success" of the surge has been related to "buying" the loyalty of insurgents. But when we stop paying them, what will happen? Will they continue to be allied with the U.S.?
White House supporters in Congress snuck a provision into a previous defense funding bill that eliminated the federal agency that investigates fraud in Iraq. And Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has announced that neither he nor his cabinet may be investigated for corruption.
For more see: SFChronicle and NBC
Pork Barrel Spending
$107,000 to study the sex life of the Japanese quail.
$1.2 million to study the breeding habits of the woodchuck.
$150,000 to study the Hatfield-McCoy feud.
$84,000 to find out why people fall in love.
$19 million to examine gas emissions from cow flatulence.
$144,000 to see if pigeons follow human economic laws.
$219,000 to teach college students how to watch television.
$2 million to construct an ancient Hawaiian canoe.
$20 million for a demonstration project to build wooden bridges.
$160,000 to study if you can hex an opponent by drawing an X on his chest.
$100,000 to study how to avoid falling spacecraft.
$1 million to preserve a sewer in Trenton, NJ, as a historic monument.
$6,000 for a document on Worcestershire sauce.
$57,000 for gold-embossed playing cards on Air Force Two.
For more see: 2008 Pig Book and CNN and Fox News
Sunday, May 11, 2008
Massive Halliburton Fraud in Iraq
Fore more see: BBC and NYTimes
Tuesday, May 6, 2008
Unbelievable!
“It appears to me that the administration wants to silence the messenger that is giving us information about waste and fraud in Iraq,” said Rep. Henry Waxman, a member of the House Committee on Government Reform.
Soon after this provision was discovered, it was changed. Bowen's office will now be closed 18o days after only $250 million in reconstruction remains unspent.
For more see: Stuart Bowen's Report and NYTimes
Monday, May 5, 2008
Who's Your Daddy?
The Pentagon is planning a $5 billion transformation of the "green zone" in Baghdad into a tourist paradise to go along with the soon-to-be-completed $1 billion U.S. Embassy there. The development is apparently being developed by a firm involved in Disneyland USA and envisions, among other things, a Marriott Hotel, Tigris Woods golf course, riverfront park, museum, theatre and an amusement park.
An important question that goes unanswered is, how much taxpayer money will go into this $5 billion development? Since the Congress has no idea of precisely where the billions of war funding for Iraq goes, how much of this will be U.S. taxpayers funded? Is this a higher priority than water, sewers and electricity?
For more information see: ABC News and Contrary View
Sunday, May 4, 2008
How to Hack a Voting Machine
Even machines with a paper trail can be programmed to print out one result while tabluating another. And optical scanning machines can also be compromised as well if their computer code is modified. Below is a demonstration of how a voting machine is compromised.
For more see: Princeton Study and Confesions of a Computer Hacker and Hacking in 60 seconds
Saturday, May 3, 2008
On Whose Side is the EPA?
Some people wonder if the Environmental Protection Agency is there to protect the public or the industries EPA is suppose to regulate. Mary Gade, director of the Midwest office of EPA tried to force the Dow Chemical Company to clean up contamination in the Tittabawassee River system where dioxin levels were the highest amounts ever found in the U.S.
But after Dow met with EPA officials in Washington, Gade was fired. This is not the first time EPA has appeared to side with industry as it previously denied California permission to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions from automobiles and refused to declare greenhouse-gas emissions a threat. For more see: WSJ and Chicago Tribune
Video Length 4 min 17 sec
But after Dow met with EPA officials in Washington, Gade was fired. This is not the first time EPA has appeared to side with industry as it previously denied California permission to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions from automobiles and refused to declare greenhouse-gas emissions a threat. For more see: WSJ and Chicago Tribune
Thursday, May 1, 2008
When Lobbyists Become Regulators
Anne Mulkern and Source Watch and Washington Monthly
Monday, April 28, 2008
Halliburton Rape Cover Up
Halliburton employee Jamie Leigh Jones was apparently gang-raped by company workers, but the State Department and the Justice Department seem to be covering up this, and similar rapes in Iraq. After two years, there has yet to be an investigation. The State Department appears to have a "hands-off" attitude toward contractors in Iraq, some say, preferring to look the other way.
For more information see: ABC News and Contrary View
Video Length 2 min 55 sec
For more information see: ABC News and Contrary View
Sunday, April 27, 2008
Hotlining
Bet you never heard of hotlining. I hadn’t until I read that hotlining is used to pass legislation in the U.S. Senate without a vote if both the majority and minority leaders agree. “Today, the Senate passes most bills unread and without any deliberation.” While some bills such as naming post offices may not be worthy of debate, other bills involving hundreds of millions of dollars are hotlined. Is our Senate too busy with fundraising to concern itself with legislation? To learn more go to:
TrishandHalli and DownsizeDC
The EB-5 Visa Program
EB5-Visas and Wall Street Journal
Deferred Prosecutions
NYTimes and Democracy Now!
Crack Cocaine
Did you know that you can go to prison for up to 30 years on crack cocaine charges even if you have never distributed, sold, touched or used cocaine? Even if you have never been arrested before for anything? Well you can and there are thousands of girlfriends of crack dealers that are presently soaking us millions of taxpayer dollars in prison for no good reason with these long sentences for simply being romantically involved with a dealer. Where is the justice here?
For more information go to:
Democracy Now! and Sentencing
Friday, November 30, 2007
Venzuela
What if the United States were preparing to hold a national election on a constitutional amendment that a foreign country didn’t like? What if that foreign country sent operatives into the United States to influence people’s votes and to stir up controversy? Would that be ok? Well, a CIA plan entitled, "OPERATION PLIERS," proposed to impede the recent Venezuelan constitutional referendum and then encourage the Venezuelans to refuse to recognize the results if the yes vote won. For more see:
Democracy Now and Venzuelian Analysis
Sunday, October 7, 2007
Blackwater Impunity
For more information go to:
LATimes and WashPost and LATimes2
Genocide in The Congo
BBC Report and NYTimes
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)